Level 5 Guidance5CO02 → AC 1.5

5CO02 AC 1.5

Assessment question / task focus: Assess two ethical perspectives and how they can influence moral decision-making in people practice.

What the worked example shows

The worked example for this criterion develops the required concepts through the relevant case context, evidence and practical implications. Use the paid worked example to see the full reasoning, structure and references.

This is a deliberately shortened extraction of the themes demonstrated in the paid worked-example resource. It is not the complete answer.

Key areas to develop in your own answer

  • Identify the main concept, framework, model, practice or issue contained in the task.
  • Use the case-study facts rather than writing only generic HR theory.
  • Connect the relevant people-practice issue to organisational impact, employee outcomes or business objectives where the task requires it.
  • For higher-order command verbs, weigh evidence, limitations, alternatives or implications rather than simply describing points.
  • Support substantive claims with appropriate academic or professional evidence and use the referencing approach required by your centre.

Study direction

Read the shortened guidance first, then use the complete worked example to study how the ideas are developed into a structured response. The worked example is a study resource: adapt the reasoning, conduct your own research and write your own assessment response.

Command verb: Pay particular attention to the first word of the task — explain, analyse, assess, evaluate, compare, discuss or another verb — because it determines the depth of reasoning expected.

Want the complete worked example? View the 2026 worked example →
Academic-integrity reminder: This page provides study guidance and a limited extract of the worked-example themes. It is not a model answer or submission-ready assessment. Use the current assessment brief as the authoritative source.